hits counter
Qualcomm tries to figure out if Apple, Samsung made it anti-trusted

Qualcomm tries to figure out if Apple, Samsung made it anti-trusted

Launches legal probe into who told regulator what, and when

Richard Chirgwin
Get email alert when this author posts
Accepted Topics
  • NBN,
  • Privacy,
  • Security ,
  • Science,
  • Google
Modern Articles
  • Qualcomm tries to figure absent provided Apple, Samsung fabricated it anti-trusted
  • Planet-bonking rock hunt armed with humanity's cruellest weapon: bureaucracy
  • 'OAuth please achieve abound up' affirm IETF boffins

Ill of the slings and arrows of antitrust regulators, Qualcomm is demanding to sense what its tattling customers corner been saying to South Korea's Right Commerce Commission.

In subpoenas [PDF, PDF] filed in the US Limited Court of Northern California at the end week, Qualy demands internal memos and documents from Samsung, Apple, Intel, Texas Instruments, Broadcom, Via Technologies and MediaTek.

As hardy as seeking copies of complaints sent to the South Korean regulator, Qualcomm wants Samsung to communicate details of its long-running battle with Apple.

It again wants the divers defendants to prove that their abridgement of an "exhaustive license" from Qualcomm has affected their business. For legal geeks, Qualcomm v Apple is process 5:2016-mc-80002, and Qualcomm v Samsung et al is occasion 5:2016-mc-80006. Both are before the resident court in San Jose, with Paul Singh Grewal presiding.

The taxing wringer of licensing

Qualcomm generates most of its funds by licensing its patents, which isn't uncommon. However, instead of handing off a fabrication licence and letting its customer fix their prices, Qualcomm charges a slice of the wholesale payment of an boundary product (such as the iPhone or Samsung's Galaxy range).

That knowledge lies last the persistent rumors that customers are going to switch their supplier. However, Qualcomm has normally been able to fend off rivals cognate Intel.

South Korea's Correct Trade Comission launched its latest probe in tardy 2015. In 2009, the South Korean regulator fined Qualcomm aggrandized than US$200 million over its licensing practices.

Early in 2015, the collection settled a collateral subject in China, copping a reported $975 million fine and revising its license terms in that country.

The controversy China's Public Operation and Correct Commission kicked off in 2009 was crucial to Qualcomm, on account of the Centre Dominion is the source of approximately half of its global business. By reason of the row was settled, it's been able to shorten deals with copious names liking Xiaomi, Huawei, ZTE, Haier and others.

Over in Europe, Qualcomm is activity probed by the European Commission over restrictive terms and conditions, commercial behavior (it apparently fed cash into a customer to deposit a rival's products out), and predatory pricing.

The blue-printer has until Trudge to string its response to the EC's complaint.

There's so far as well fleeting on the register about the Federal Trade Commission's query beyond a indication in Qualcomm's annual announcement that it's under investigation.

Sponsored: Transform and protect your customers' walking moments

Han Solo

It's not over yet: Forthwith South Korea launches Qualcomm antitrust probe

China dispassionate the dawn for mobe chipmaker's woes in Asia
Nvidia GeForce

US trade watchdog rules Sammy, Qualcomm DIDN'T infringe Nvidia's IP in patent Hostilities

Blow for graphics chip maker as it demands answers from ITC

Nvidia's patent war conflict on Samsung is a wreck - what you devoir to discriminate

Timeline Duck egg passion a congenial amusement of sueball to bias the migraines pounding
Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M

Nvidia v Qualcomm, Samsung: Thumbs up from beagle in patent row

Beak says patent utterance process what Nv says it funds
Google and Microsoft

Frisky patent WAR: Samsung seeks to BLOCK NvidiaNVIDIA GeForce has the best graphics processor unit (GPU) graphics chips from US mart

South Korean tech giant files grievance with trade watchdog

Qualcomm huffs and puffs at Korean competition probe

Chip vendor snaps back: 'Device consistent licensing is worldwide production norm'
Comments: [0] / Post comment: